Problems with radiocarbon dating methods
Part 1 (in the previous issue) explained how scientists observe unstable atoms changing into stable atoms in the present.
Part 2 explains how scientists run into problems when they make assumptions about what happened .
Most people think that radioactive dating has proven the earth is billions of years old.
Yet this view is based on a misunderstanding of how radiometric dating works.
The theory of evolution has become so ubiquitous in the scientific world today that it even distorts the way geological formations are dated.
These dates supposedly prove these formations are millions of years old rather than thousands.
“While an organism is alive and is taking in carbon from the atmosphere, it contains this balanced proportion of 14C.
However, at death the balance is upset, because replenishment by life processes such as feeding, breathing and photosynthesis ceases.
Yet we find that different methods can yield radically different results.
As explains: “Several methods have been devised for estimating the age of the earth and its layers of rocks.